throwback

november 11th 2006

Halloween

conviction

-So, Samuel. The Euthyphro dilemma asks this question: Does God love what is pious because it is pious, or is what is pious pious because it's loved by God?

-What do you mean by pious?

-I mean what is moral, what is considered to be "good" in a religious sense.

-I don't believe morality exists.

-You don't think morality exists?

-I know it does not.

-But surely you agree that there have been and continue be religions with their own unique moral code? And that these moral code are given authority by a supreme being? What I'm pointing out is that there is a inherent tension within any moral code that supports its truth and legitimacy on the will of God. What I'm asking you is this: Is what is moral commanded by God because it is moral, or is it moral because it is commanded by God?

-You're operating on a fallacy here, my friend. There is no such thing as morality, and so your question is meaningless.

He was real smart, smarter than most, but he was so concerned with presenting a confident and assured and powerful opinion that he couldn't even listen to what was being asked of him.

i'll miss you.

not happy at all

thinker of thoughts

The great Zen master Rinzai said, "After all, there was nothing much in Obaku's Buddhism." He went on to explain to his students that the art of Zen, or teaching Zen, is like deceiving a child with an empty fist. You know how you intrigue a child by pretending you have something very precious in your fist. You can play this game for an hour, provoking the child to ever greater enthusiasm to find out what you have. At the end, the revelation is that nothing was there. Many people say in the course of their Zen training, "I realize there was nothing to realize. It was all there from the beginning." Standing opposite this realization that you cannot do anything about your desires, and equally that you cannot do nothing about them is the awakening that this realization is true because there is no you separate from you. In other words, when you try to control your thoughts, or feelings, there is no difference between the thoughts and the controller. What you call the thinker is simply your thought of yourself. The thinker is a thought among thoughts, and the feeler is a feeling among feelings, but trying to control thoughts with thoughts is like trying to bite your own teeth.